Note: This is an analysis of the 2007 movie "Breach". If you haven't seen the movie and wish to see it, this article will most definitely spoil some of it for you.
.I had been meaning to see the movie "Breach" since it was released in February 2007 but never got around to it.
I just finally finished watching it and thought it was a very interesting movie.
The movie is the story of former American F.B.I. Agent
Robert Philip Hanssen who was arrested and sentenced for life in prison for having sold information to the Soviet Union for over 20 years. Possibly the biggest case of espionage in America and has been described as "possibly the worst intelligence disaster in US history."(according to wikipedia.org). It is true story of this spy and the man who helped to catch him, former F.B.I. operative
Eric O' Neill(
picture).
There were a few things in this movie that fascinated me and in fact astounded me and I would like to share them with you.
First I must say that I find very extraordinary the fact that with a good understanding of the history of the Order of the Jesuits and comprehension of their purpose, the sons of Loyola(where we today have the word LOYAL from), comes ultimately a greater, greater understanding of so much that we see in our past, present and unfortunate possible future if things do not change.
All around us. From why we feel so tired over all to why everything that is presented to us is presented the way it is.
As some of you may already realize and understand, the greater majority of all media is controlled by Papal Knights or Freemasons and therefor to the Jesuits in Rome and as Brother Eric Jon Phelps(Author of
Vatican Assassins-Wounded in the House of my Friends) says it so well, the Jesuits brag in their movies. I think they love it knowing the world is too damn naive to realize it and/or to do something. The sad part is that they are right for the greater part. A good example for this is the 1991 non fiction movie "J.F.K" where all evidence is presented proving that Kennedy was viciously murdered by the ones closest to him and not Oswald and then, Kennedy's coffin is shown with a Jesuit cross on it...And the high level Jesuits are laughing in their Jesuit beards.
I have found the movie "V for Vatican(Vendetta)" to be a big clear brag as well. These men in black that have infiltrated the world behind masks and who create all of these terror attacks...This can be talked about in an another article or paper that is long over due.
I want to focus on the movie "Breach" and how it was so accurate in such subtle ways that scream out black on white for those who watch with the right eye.
Robert Hanssen was a devout Roman Catholic and
Opus Dei(note that wikipedia is a poor source for such things as secret Papal societies and you may be subject to lies and propaganda, however it is for a basic understanding of what it is that I link to it). The man who helped to catch him, Eric O'Neill, was a Catholic who was Jesuit educated at
Gonzaga College High School.
These things are nice to know but what I find interesting is the emphasis on these things in the movie "Breach" when the word "Jesuit(s)" is clearly mentioned four times, the words "Opus Dei" once and many of the scenes either evolve around a Catholic Church or show Catholic ornaments.
In one of the scenes, the character of Hanssen asks the character of O'Neill about his wife and if she is a Catholic, O'Neil answers that she is not and is from Protestant roots. When he(O'Neill) tells Hanssen that she(O'Neill's wife) is from Germany(home of Protestantism), Hanssen frowns and says something along the lines of "this will need to be fix" or something implying that.
Remember that the movie evolves around these two men...
Both men are presented as Catholics, Hanssen being much more devout than O'Neill but none the less, it shows both of them kneeling in a Catholic Church or in front of a crucifix or rosary at one point or another during the film. There are many very blatant shots that highlight Catholicism, including a shot and zoom on a Catechism book on Hanssen's desk.
Already understanding that the Jesuit Order in Rome controls both the KGB and CIA through high level Papal Knighthood as well as the FBI through high level Freemasonry, I was eager to see where this movie was going to come to with all the blatant information on these two guys having such strong links to Roman Catholic Institution.
I was astounded by the conclusion of the movie and I was already taking notes near the ending.
At one point in the movie, Hanssen asks O'Neill to get him a painting that is in someone else's office and states twice that it is a painting of two men in a boat.
The painting is a painting by
Winslow Homer who was a known Painter and Print Maker in the 1800s - early 1900s.
When they(the FBI) finally have caught the guy(Hanssen), there is a scene of O'Neill and his supperior in Hanssen's (former) office and they both look at the painting as one of them sais: "Two men in a boat". In the next and last scene, O'Neill and Hansson find themselves face to face at an elevator and the movie ends with Hanssen telling O'Neill, "Pray for me" to which O'Neill replies, "I will.".
This movie overall showed two men, from two "opposing" forces in ONE BOAT, serving the SAME GOD(the pope).
I believe there is much more to this movie and watching it a couple more times may reveil more. There was an odd emphasis on Hanssen's pen, little things like O'Neill's superior saying that she has no one, "not even a cat" and referring to that again later in the film.
I thought that to be a very fascinating and interesting movie all together.
And the Jesuits are laughing in their beards...
-Payazo-
